Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

District Court Dismisses Class Action Challenge to UnitedHealth PBM Payments (PDF)
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota Link to more items from this source
Dec. 20, 2017
36 pages. "Plaintiffs allege ... that they were entitled to pay less than they were charged as copayments or coinsurance under the terms of their plans because their plans entitled Plaintiffs to receive the benefit of the discounted rate ... Plaintiffs allege that they purchased certain drugs on numerous occasions and were overcharged due to OptumRx's contribution calculations, resulting in spreads and clawbacks.... [The plans] do not entitle those ERISA Plaintiffs to the discounted rate as a 'lesser of' payment option when filling prescription drugs at retail network pharmacies. Because those ERISA Plaintiffs do not allege that Defendants violated the terms of their Plans other than by not allowing them to pay lesser, discounted rates, such Plaintiffs fail to state claims for benefits under ERISA Section 502(a)(1)(B)." [In re UnitedHealth Group PBM Litigation, No. 16-3352 (D. Minn. Dec. 19, 2017)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).