Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

The Proposed Rule for Association Health Plans: What It Says and What It Would Do
Katie Keith in Health Affairs Forefront Link to more items from this source
[Guidance Overview]
Jan. 5, 2018

"One repeated consideration that characterizes the rule is the Department's effort to ensure that a group or association has a 'sufficiently close economic or representational nexus to the employers and employees that participate in the plan.' Where an employment relationship to the association does not exist, the only connection between a member employer and the association is the health coverage itself. When that is the case, courts have held that the relationship is more similar to a relationship between an employer and a state-regulated private insurer, which would be subject to many more consumer protections. The Department asserts throughout the rule that it has adequately addressed concerns about these types of arrangements masquerading as AHPs."  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).