Featured Jobs
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Texas v. United States: What Did The DOJ Do? (PDF)
National Health Law Program [NHeLP] 
[Opinion] June 20, 2018
"The error in the DOJ's position is that it views Congress's decision to repeal the individual mandate through the lens of the 2010 decision to pass the ACA and the Supreme Court's decision in NFIB. In 2010, Congress made explicit findings that the individual mandate was essential to the guaranteed issue and community rating provisions, implying that the other two would not function if the individual mandate was struck down."
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |