Featured Jobs
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
401K Safe
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Pension Investors Corporation
|
|
3(16) Retirement Plan & Customer Liaison Compass
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
401K Safe
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Plaintiffs' Bar Takes Another Hit in 403(b) Excessive Fee Cases
Seyfarth Shaw 
Oct. 10, 2018
"The latest blow to these largely cookie cutter cases ... alleged that the plan paid excessive fees for administrative or investment management services, the plan should have consolidated to one recordkeeper (as opposed to two), that certain funds underperformed and that the plan's fiduciaries caused the plan to engage in prohibited transactions.... The court reasoned that the complaint starts with the false premise that just because the plan's fees could have been lower, there must have been some breach of duty." [Davis v. Washington Univ. in St. Louis, No. 17-1641 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 28, 2018)]
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |