Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Eighth Circuit Case Highlights Importance of Digging into Third Party Administrator Procedures
Thompson Hine LLP via Lexology; registration required Link to more items from this source
July 25, 2019
"Some TPAs ... have ceased the practice [of cross-plan offsetting] altogether, at least with respect to non-network providers. Others, responding only to the Eighth Circuit's narrow ruling, have taken the position that the practice is still permissible as long as it's specifically authorized by the plan.... [P]lan sponsors looking to minimize risk should opt out or otherwise end the practice of cross-plan offsetting. Even if the plan has already been given the opportunity to opt out, and the window has passed, nothing prevents a plan sponsor from revisiting the issue with the Plan's TPA." [Peterson v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., No. 17-1744 (8th Cir. Jan. 15, 2019; cert. pet. filed May 30, 2019)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).