Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement USA LLC
(Remote)

MAP Retirement USA LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Utica NY / PA / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

3(16) Fiduciary Analyst

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions logo

Relationship Manager

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Hybrid)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Mergers & Acquisition Specialist

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Relationship Manager

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

DB Account Manager

Pentegra
(Remote)

Pentegra logo

Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Remote / NJ)

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC logo

Managing Director - Operations, Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote / CT / MA / NJ / NY / PA / Hybrid)

Daybright Financial logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Another District Court Rejects Use of Segal Blend for Use in Multiemployer Plan Withdrawal Liability
October Three Consulting Link to more items from this source
June 23, 2020

"Employers who have withdrawn from a multiemployer pension fund that has assessed a withdrawal liability using the Segal Blend or some other discount rate assumption that varies from that used for funding and who do want to consider challenging that liability should consider: [1] Getting an analysis from an actuary independent from the fund of what the difference in withdrawal liability would have been had the fund used the same discount rate it does for funding calculations. [2] Determining whether that difference is sufficient to justify the cost and effort of pursuing arbitration and a possible court battle." [Sofco Erectors, Inc. v. Trustees of the Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Fund, No. 19-2238 (S.D. Ohio May 19, 2020)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).