Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Pension Consultant

Randall & Hurley, Inc.
(Remote / Liberty Lake WA / Helena MT)

Randall & Hurley, Inc. logo

Retirement Plan Administrator - Senior Associate

PBMares
(Norfolk VA)

PBMares logo

Plan Compliance Analyst (Administrator)

RPA
(Remote)

RPA logo

Education Consultant

Pentegra
(Remote / Putnam Valley NY)

Pentegra logo

Senior Defined Benefits Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



District Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Fee Request in Connection with State Court Remand of Action Removed Under ERISA
Robinson & Cole LLP, via LexBlogLink to more items from this source
Jan. 5, 2021

"A recent decision out of the District Court of New Jersey exemplifies how even the most seemingly mundane procedural act — removal — implicates procedural and legal nuances with which courts continue to grapple." [Newton v. South Jersey Paper Products Company, Inc., No. 19-17289 (D.N.J. Dec. 17, 2020)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2022 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.