Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Tenth Circuit: Hartford Fulfilled Its Obligation to Investigate the Existence of Beneficiaries in ERISA Life Insurance Dispute
Roberts Disability Law Link to more items from this source
Sept. 22, 2021

"The decedent was shot and killed by an unknown person. He was survived by his parents, his ex-wife, and his children.... The decedent's father submitted an executed Preference Beneficiary Affidavit (PBA) stating that the decedent had no children.... The Tenth Circuit ... held that Hartford did not fail to adequately investigate whether there were other potential beneficiaries when it paid the parents the supplemental life and AD&D benefits.... The court rejected the children's argument that the PBA was not a plan document, and as such, it was unreasonable for Hartford to rely on it. " [Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co. v. Jones-Atchison, No. 20-6135 (10th Cir. Sep. 20, 2021)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).