Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Education Consultant

Pentegra
(Remote / Putnam Valley NY)

Pentegra logo

Plan Compliance Analyst (Administrator)

RPA
(Remote)

RPA logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Final Thoughts Before the Hughes v. Northwestern Supreme Court Oral Argument
Euclid Specialty ManagersLink to more items from this source
[Opinion]
Dec. 6, 2021

"As we head into oral argument, [the authors'] advice has not changed. The goal for plan sponsors is to win the war, not just this individual battle, on excessive fee lawsuits. We need a more rigorous pleadings standard to divide 'the plausible sheep from the meritless goats,' regardless of the final outcome in the Northwestern case." [Hughes v. Northwestern Univ., No. 18-2569 (7th Cir. Mar. 25, 2020; cert. pet. granted No. 19-1401, Jul. 2, 2020)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2022 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.