Featured Jobs
|
Regional Sales Director-Heartland July Business Services
|
|
Experienced Employee Benefits Attorney Shipman & Goodwin LLP
|
|
Stones River Consulting
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Spectrum Pension Consultants (part of Daybright Financial)
|
|
Director, Strategic Accounts and Channel Development July Business Services
|
|
Director of Regulatory Operations and Compliance PCS Retirement
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Internal Channel Sales Team Lead July Business Services
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Relationship Manager – Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Mid Atlantic July Business Services
|
|
Independent Retirement
|
|
Independent Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Responding to ERISA Claims: Why You Should Bring Rule 52 Motions Instead of Rule 56 Summary Judgment Motions
Lane Powell PC 
Dec. 13, 2021 "[A] new case highlights why Rule 52 motions may be the preferred motion to efficiently resolve ERISA benefit claims.... In most circuits, with cases involving de novo review, the safer practice is to bring Rule 52 motions for judgment, which allows the court to assess the weight and credibility of the evidence and requires the court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law." [Avenoso v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., No. 21-1772 (8th Cir. Nov. 30, 2021)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |