Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
Pollard & Associates
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Supreme Court Holds ERISA Requires Plaintiffs to Allege Context-Specific Breaches of Fiduciary Duty to Monitor Investments
Greenberg Traurig Feb. 3, 2022 "By emphasizing that at the pleading stage this standard applies with full force to plaintiffs in ERISA excessive fee cases, and underscoring that the viability of such a claim depends on a fact specific inquiry, the Supreme Court's unanimous opinion suggests cookie cutter allegations of fiduciary breach drawn from other cases may not suffice. Rather, going forward, courts may require plaintiffs to plead facts showing that the specific decisions fiduciaries have made, under the then-existing circumstances, plausibly amount to a violation of ERISA's fiduciary standard of care." [Hughes v. Northwestern Univ., No. 19-1401 (S. Ct. Jan. 24, 2022)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |