Featured Jobs
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Regional Sales Director (West) July Business Services
|
|
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc.
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
No More Surprises, But Much Uncertainty Over Non-Network Bills
Seyfarth 
Mar. 1, 2022 "Plan sponsors should be aware ... that in the absence of the regulatory presumption in favor of the QPA, there is a greater risk that an arbitrator would side with the provider rather than the plan, resulting in potentially greater payment obligations from the plan sponsor." [Texas Medical Assoc. v. HHS, No. 21-0425 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2022)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |
