Fringe Benefit Group
|
Pollard & Associates
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
Defined Benefit Consultant/Enrolled Actuary Pension Plan Specialists, PC
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
State PBM Regulation: Oklahoma District Court Latest to Rule on ERISA, Part D Preemption
Crowell & Moring LLP Apr. 8, 2022 "PCMA contended that these provisions had an impermissible connection with ERISA because they directly affected ERISA plans by dictating network composition, cost-sharing differentials, and communications with beneficiaries, or, in some cases, the benefit design of a plan.... The court acknowledged that these provisions might alter the incentives and limit some of the options that an ERISA plan can use, and would have some effect on the way PBMs pay and/or reimburse pharmacies, but held that they did not impermissibly dictate the design of ERISA plans or force the plans into making any specific choices." [Pharmaceutical Care Management Assoc. (PCMA) v. Mulready, No. 19-0977 (W.D. Okla. Apr. 4, 2022)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |