Featured Jobs
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Pentegra
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Southern Pension Services
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
District Court Dismisses Section 510 Benefits Interference Claim Made by Law Firm Associate
Thomson Reuters Practical Law 
June 2, 2022 "A federal district court rejected a law firm associate's claim for interference with benefits under Section 510 of [ERISA]. According to the court, the associate did not provide sufficient evidence that his firm's stated reasons for terminating the associate's employment were pretextual." [Joffe v. King & Spalding LLP, No. 17-3392 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2022)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |