Featured Jobs
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
The MandMarblestone Group, llc
|
|
Senior Plan Consultant, Defined Benefit DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Senior Retirement Plan Administrator (TPA) Public Accounting Firm
|
|
The Pension Source
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Participant Support Representative Daybright Financial
|
|
Senior Counsel – Investment Solutions Great Gray Trust Company
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
When 'Public' Does Not Refer to 'Governmental'
Best Best & Krieger LLP 
Aug. 9, 2022 "[If] you are trying to determine whether a particular plan is exempt from ERISA, you need to ask if the 'plan' is a 'governmental plan,' not if the sponsor is a 'public' employer.... [It] might be possible for certain entities to be both public charities and governmental organizations. We discussed this in an earlier post where we referred to such entities as 'bitaxual.' And, while there are some distinct retirement plan advantages to being bitaxual, there are also some potential retirement plan pitfalls." |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |