Featured Jobs
|
Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
|
|
DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
|
|
Retirement Plan Administrator (Part-Time) Accelefund, Inc.
|
|
Participant Services & Operations Coordinator Pentegra
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Defined Benefit Specialist II or III Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Retirement Plan Termination Specialist Compass
|
|
Merkley Retirement Consultants
|
|
The Pension Source
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
ERISA Ruling Rightly Addresses Civil Procedure Hurdle
DeBofsky Sherman Casciari Reynolds P.C. 
Aug. 15, 2022 "[I]nstead of plenary hearings, ERISA claims are mostly conducted as record review proceedings. That means courts generally disallow the introduction of any evidence not previously introduced during the claim process. On July 29, a federal appellate court ruled that a district court's preclusion of additional evidence proffered by the plaintiff in an ERISA benefits case was erroneous." [Harris v. The Lincoln National Life Ins. Co., No. 21-13186 (11th Cir. Jul. 29, 2022)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |