Featured Jobs
|
BPAS
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
An ERISA Potboiler for Your End of Summer Reading Pleasure
Kantor & Kantor 
Aug. 24, 2022 "[T]he court rejected defendants' argument that Nancy lacked standing to sue as she was not a participant in the plan. The court stated that Nancy's claims were rooted in the plausible idea that she would have been a plan participant but for defendants' actions, which conferred her with standing. Finally, the court stated that the ERISA claims as currently pled were sufficient to withstand merits challenges at the motion to dismiss stage." [Batal-Sholler v. Batal, No. 21-0376 (D. Me. Aug. 15, 2022)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |