Featured Jobs
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
|
Pollard & Associates
|
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
An ERISA Potboiler for Your End of Summer Reading Pleasure
Kantor & Kantor 
Aug. 24, 2022 "[T]he court rejected defendants' argument that Nancy lacked standing to sue as she was not a participant in the plan. The court stated that Nancy's claims were rooted in the plausible idea that she would have been a plan participant but for defendants' actions, which conferred her with standing. Finally, the court stated that the ERISA claims as currently pled were sufficient to withstand merits challenges at the motion to dismiss stage." [Batal-Sholler v. Batal, No. 21-0376 (D. Me. Aug. 15, 2022)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |
