"The court's finding ... benefits long COVID sufferers who work in other cognitively demanding occupations. The ruling also established that a specific diagnosis is not essential.... Since there are no specific laboratory tests available to diagnose long COVID ... the absence of concurrence among Abrams's physicians as to his diagnosis was not surprising ... What obviously led to the favorable outcome here, though, was the consistency of the evidence favoring Abrams."[Abrams v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, No. 21-0980 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 27, 2022)]