Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

DC Administrator

Pension Investors Corporation
(Remote / Altamonte Springs FL)

Pension Investors Corporation logo

3(16) Retirement Plan & Customer Liaison

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

California Appellate Court Affirms Retirement Board's Limits on Inclusion of 'Straddled' Leave Cashouts in Retirement Allowance Determinations
Nossaman LLP Link to more items from this source
Jan. 23, 2024

"The Alameda decision resolved the constitutionality of one key aspect of PEPRA as it applies to members of CERL retirement systems who first were enrolled in certain California public retirement plans prior to January 1, 2013 ('legacy' or 'classic' members). The VCERA decision has now given further force, and meaning, to the Alameda decision. As anticipated, however, the scope of Alameda and its application in particular circumstances continues to be the subject of debate and litigation." [VCERA v. County of Ventura, No. B325722 [Calif. Second DCA Jan. 4, 2024)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).