Featured Jobs
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
BPAS
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
The Watered-Down Benchmark in the U.S. Bancorp Excess Fee Case
Encore Fiduciary 
[Opinion] Apr. 5, 2024 "A meaningful benchmark in an excess recordkeeping fee case would be a reliable, national benchmark of what all similarly-sized plans pay for services -- not fees from a few random plans. And any such benchmark would show that $29 is a reasonable recordkeeping for a jumbo defined contribution plan. The U.S. Bancorp case is yet another excess imprudence fee case against a plan with a low-cost investment and administrative fee structure. It is an excess fee case against a plan without excess fees." [Dionicio v. U.S. Bancorp, No. 23-0026 (D. Minn. March 21, 2024)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |