Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Do the J&J and Wells Fargo Health Plan Excess Fee Cases Meet the MetLife Decision’s High Bar for ERISA Plan Standing?
Encore Fiduciary Link to more items from this source
[Opinion]
Oct. 21, 2024

"[The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently] made clear that any future case must allege harm to participants by showing that they were charged more than is allowed under the plan document. Standing cannot be based on pure conjecture or speculation that the plan sponsor had discretion to lower participant health plan fees if the plan experiences an overall lower rate of health expenses.... The key issue is whether the alleged contribution formula is speculation, or grounded in the J&J plan document. This narrow nuance will define whether plaintiff lawyers have standing to sue health plan sponsors for fiduciary breaches in failing to reduce plan health costs." [Knudsen v. MetLife Grp., Inc., No. 23-2420 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2024)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).