Featured Jobs
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Do the J&J and Wells Fargo Health Plan Excess Fee Cases Meet the MetLife Decision’s High Bar for ERISA Plan Standing?
Encore Fiduciary
[Opinion] Oct. 21, 2024 "[The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently] made clear that any future case must allege harm to participants by showing that they were charged more than is allowed under the plan document. Standing cannot be based on pure conjecture or speculation that the plan sponsor had discretion to lower participant health plan fees if the plan experiences an overall lower rate of health expenses.... The key issue is whether the alleged contribution formula is speculation, or grounded in the J&J plan document. This narrow nuance will define whether plaintiff lawyers have standing to sue health plan sponsors for fiduciary breaches in failing to reduce plan health costs." [Knudsen v. MetLife Grp., Inc., No. 23-2420 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2024)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |