Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Do the J&J and Wells Fargo Health Plan Excess Fee Cases Meet the MetLife Decision’s High Bar for ERISA Plan Standing?
Encore Fiduciary Link to more items from this source
[Opinion]
Oct. 21, 2024

"[The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently] made clear that any future case must allege harm to participants by showing that they were charged more than is allowed under the plan document. Standing cannot be based on pure conjecture or speculation that the plan sponsor had discretion to lower participant health plan fees if the plan experiences an overall lower rate of health expenses.... The key issue is whether the alleged contribution formula is speculation, or grounded in the J&J plan document. This narrow nuance will define whether plaintiff lawyers have standing to sue health plan sponsors for fiduciary breaches in failing to reduce plan health costs." [Knudsen v. MetLife Grp., Inc., No. 23-2420 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2024)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).