Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Contributions KP

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Onboarding Specialist

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

District Court Twice Rejects United’s Efforts to Kick Behavioral Health Class Actions
ArentFox Schiff LLP Link to more items from this source
May 12, 2025

"Beach confirms that breach of fiduciary duty and wrongful denial theories grounded in restrictive clinical criteria remain viable post-Wit, while Jones demonstrates how plaintiffs can tailor class definitions to navigate the Ninth Circuit's reprocessing limitations. Collectively, the decisions signal sustained judicial scrutiny of behavioral health guidelines and underscore the importance of robust, GASC-compliant medical necessity criteria and transparent claims communications." [Beach v. United Behavioral Health, No. 21-8612 (N.D. Calif. May 5, 2025); Jones v. United Behavioral Health, No. 19-6999 (N.D. Calif. Apr. 14, 2025)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).