Featured Jobs
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Implications and Action Items for ERISA Attorneys Following Cunningham v. Cornell University
Verrill Dana LLP 
July 8, 2025 "[A]ttorneys for ERISA fiduciaries must hope that the district courts can quickly develop a body of case law under Rule 7(a)(7) that will allow them to screen out meritless prohibited transaction claims. At the very least, litigation counsel for ERISA fiduciaries should become familiar with case law concerning application of the Rule in their Circuit and prepare to file motions for an order requesting a Rule 7(a)(7) reply in each lawsuit where a prohibited transaction count is alleged." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |