Featured Jobs
|
Independent Retirement
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Mid Atlantic July Business Services
|
|
Experienced Employee Benefits Attorney Shipman & Goodwin LLP
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Director, Strategic Accounts and Channel Development July Business Services
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Heartland July Business Services
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Internal Channel Sales Team Lead July Business Services
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Spectrum Pension Consultants (part of Daybright Financial)
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Relationship Manager – Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Director of Regulatory Operations and Compliance PCS Retirement
|
|
Stones River Consulting
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
401(k) Forfeiture Litigation: Implications for Plan Sponsors
Bond, Schoeneck & King
July 15, 2025 "A plan could be amended to prescribe the order priority of forfeiture use rather than allowing the plan administrator to decide.... Another option that maintains some discretion in how forfeitures are used is to amend the plan to unambiguously vest discretion in the plan sponsor (not the administrator) as a plan funding decision and settlor function.... Finally, a plan sponsor could amend the plan to require that, when forfeitures are used to pay administrative expenses, they may only be used to pay administrative expenses that would have otherwise been borne by the employer[.]" MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |