Featured Jobs
|
Retirement Compliance Consultant Navia Benefit Solutions
|
|
Senior Counsel - Benefits and Total Rewards Tyson Foods
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Heller Pension Associates, Inc.
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Senior ERISA Compliance Analyst Employee Fiduciary, LLC
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
Executive Assistant / Sales Support M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Retirement Plan Installation & Document Manager Fringe Benefit Group
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Free Publications
|
|
Every Plan Commits Prohibited Transactions: The Cornell University Decision
FredReish.com 
July 24, 2025 "The recent Supreme Court decision ... held that the burden of proof for determining whether the conditions of 408(b)(2) were satisfied [is] on the plan fiduciaries, meaning that plaintiffs' attorneys can simply allege that the fiduciaries hired service providers and then the fiduciaries must prove that they satisfied the conditions of the exemption." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |