Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Enrolled Actuary

DWC (The 401k Experts)
(Remote)

DWC (The 401k Experts) logo

3(16) Plan Customer Liaison, Enrollments

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Pension Administrator

PPS Pension Services
(Remote / Williamsville NY / Hybrid)

PPS Pension Services logo

Benefits Manager

LucidHealth
(Remote)

LucidHealth logo

Relationship Manager

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Sr 5500 & Notices Manager

401k Generation
(Altamonte Springs FL / Hybrid)

401k Generation logo

Health Benefits Actuarial Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Senior Retirement Plan Administrator

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

ERISA Team Lead

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Director of Benefits

Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff
(Cleveland OH / Hybrid)

Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff logo

Participant Services Representative West Coast

BPAS
(Remote / Spokane WA)

BPAS logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

The Pension Design Group
(Remote / Columbus OH / Hybrid)

The Pension Design Group logo

Actuary Analyst

ERISA Services Inc.
(Remote)

ERISA Services Inc. logo

Senior 401k Plan Administrator

FMI Retirement Services
(Remote / Huntington NY)

FMI Retirement Services logo

Benefits Manager

Hilldrup.com
(Stafford VA / Hybrid)

Hilldrup.com logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Publications

LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Section 1557: A Battleground for What's Considered Discrimination on the Basis of Sex
Boutwell Fay LLP Link to more items from this source
Sept. 8, 2025

"Because the injunctions granted in Tennessee v. Becerra and Texas v. Becerra are nationwide, the enforcement of the 2024 Rule is enjoined even in states where the 2024 Rule was not challenged.... It is highly anticipated that the Supreme Court will ultimately be called on to decide whether Section 1557 prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, and sexual stereotypes. This will require the Supreme Court to address an issue it declined to in Skrmetti -- whether Bostock's reasoning applies outside of the Title VII context."  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).