"[The Cunningham] ruling is somewhat puzzling, since to state a plausible claim sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss, it would seem plaintiffs would still need to do more than merely assert a prohibited transaction.... On the other hand, the Cunningham ruling may make it more difficult for retirement plan sponsors and parties in interest to dismiss cases at the outset of the litigation and may subject those parties to costly discovery." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)]  MORE >>