Featured Jobs
|
Automotive Industries Trust Funds
|
|
Combo Retirement Plan Administrator Strongpoint Partners
|
|
Independent Retirement
|
|
The Pension Source
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans MM Daybright Financial
|
|
Mergers & Acquisition Specialist Compass
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Compass
|
|
Pentegra
|
|
Senior Client Service Specialist EPIC RPS
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Retirement Plan Onboarding Specialist Compass
|
|
Strongpoint Partners
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Attorney - ERISA, Benefits, & PRT Securian Financial Group
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
The Supreme Court Prohibits ERISA
Michael Doran in Labor Law Journal, via SSRN 
[Opinion] Oct. 1, 2025 "The [Cunningham v. Cornell] ruling is badly mistaken. Because the definition of 'party in interest' includes every plan fiduciary, the Court's decision allows lawsuits for all transactions involving a plan's receipt of services, even the services mandated by ERISA. On the Court's reading of the statute, ERISA both requires that fiduciaries perform specific acts and simultaneously prohibits fiduciaries from performing those same acts." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |