Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Quality Review Specialist

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Retirement Plan Analyst - DC Plans

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

3(16) Administrator

401K Safe
(Remote)

401K Safe logo

Plan Administrator

Atlantic Pension Services Inc
(Remote / Kennett Square PA / DE / MD / NJ / NY / SC / TN)

Atlantic Pension Services Inc logo

Regional Sales Director

BPAS
(Remote / CA)

BPAS logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Ninth Circuit Orders Reconsideration of ACA Challenge to Gender-Affirming Care Exclusions
Roberts Disability Law Link to more items from this source
Nov. 19, 2025

"[The plan participants] alleged that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois (BCBSIL) violated Section 1557 of the [ACA] by enforcing categorical exclusions for gender-affirming care in self-funded ERISA plans it administered. Although the panel agreed that BCBSIL is subject to Section 1557 and rejected its arguments premised on ERISA and RFRA, it concluded that the district court's discrimination analysis -- grounded in Bostock v. Clayton County -- could not be reconciled with the Supreme Court's intervening decision in United States v. Skrmetti." [Pritchard v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, No. 23-4331 (9th Cir. Nov. 17, 2025)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).