Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Ninth Circuit Orders Reconsideration of ACA Challenge to Gender-Affirming Care Exclusions
Roberts Disability Law Link to more items from this source
Nov. 19, 2025

"[The plan participants] alleged that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois (BCBSIL) violated Section 1557 of the [ACA] by enforcing categorical exclusions for gender-affirming care in self-funded ERISA plans it administered. Although the panel agreed that BCBSIL is subject to Section 1557 and rejected its arguments premised on ERISA and RFRA, it concluded that the district court's discrimination analysis -- grounded in Bostock v. Clayton County -- could not be reconciled with the Supreme Court's intervening decision in United States v. Skrmetti." [Pritchard v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, No. 23-4331 (9th Cir. Nov. 17, 2025)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).