Post a Job

Featured Jobs

ERISA Team Leader

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Retirement Plan Installation & Document Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

Senior Counsel - Benefits and Total Rewards

Tyson Foods
(Springdale AR)

Tyson Foods logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Contributions

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Relationship Manager/ Actuary

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Executive Assistant / Sales Support

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

Senior ERISA Compliance Analyst

Employee Fiduciary, LLC
(Remote)

Employee Fiduciary, LLC logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

DC Plan Administrator

Heller Pension Associates, Inc.
(Remote / Hyde Park NY / Miami FL)

Heller Pension Associates, Inc. logo

Retirement Compliance Consultant

Navia Benefit Solutions
(Remote / Fresno CA)

Navia Benefit Solutions logo

Plan Consultant II

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Publications

LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Courts Continue Dismissal Trend in Forfeitures Cases
Miller & Chevalier Link to more items from this source
Nov. 21, 2025

"[A Texas district court found] that the plaintiffs' forfeitures theory could not stand where the forfeitures were used to reduce the employer's voluntary contributions consistent with the terms of the plan. The court noted that the use of forfeitures to reduce an employer's contribution instead of to defray administrative costs does not violate the duty of loyalty.... [In Mississippi, the district court] reasoned that because it is a 'fair and reasonable interpretation' of the plan document that Peco could either pay administrative expenses or offset employer contributions, Peco's 'use of the forfeitures to offset employer contributions did not violate the terms of the Plan.' " [Del Bosque v. Coca-Cola Southwest Beverages LLC, No. 25-1270 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2025); Brown v. Peco Foods, Inc., No. 25-0491 (S.D. Miss. Nov. 14, 2025)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).