Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Processor

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Relationship Manager - Actuary

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Plan Consultant, Defined Benefit

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

3(16) Consultant

401K Safe
(Remote)

401K Safe logo

3(16) Account Manager

Pentegra
(Remote / Putnam Valley NY)

Pentegra logo

Senior Counsel – Investment Solutions

Great Gray Trust Company
(Remote / Boston MA / Wilmington DE / Las Vegas NV / DC / FL / NC / NY / Hybrid)

Great Gray Trust Company logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Goldberg, Swedelson & Associates
(Remote / Los Angeles CA / Hybrid)

Goldberg, Swedelson & Associates logo

Relationship Manager - DC

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

The MandMarblestone Group, llc
(Remote)

The MandMarblestone Group, llc logo

Senior Plan Consultant, Defined Benefit

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Plan Admin/Employee Benefits/Office Admin

Columbia Benefits, LLC
(Remote / Denver CO)

Columbia Benefits, LLC logo

Actuary

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / Abilene TX)

The Pension Source logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Courts Continue Dismissal Trend in Forfeitures Cases
Miller & Chevalier Link to more items from this source
Nov. 21, 2025

"[A Texas district court found] that the plaintiffs' forfeitures theory could not stand where the forfeitures were used to reduce the employer's voluntary contributions consistent with the terms of the plan. The court noted that the use of forfeitures to reduce an employer's contribution instead of to defray administrative costs does not violate the duty of loyalty.... [In Mississippi, the district court] reasoned that because it is a 'fair and reasonable interpretation' of the plan document that Peco could either pay administrative expenses or offset employer contributions, Peco's 'use of the forfeitures to offset employer contributions did not violate the terms of the Plan.' " [Del Bosque v. Coca-Cola Southwest Beverages LLC, No. 25-1270 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2025); Brown v. Peco Foods, Inc., No. 25-0491 (S.D. Miss. Nov. 14, 2025)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).