Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Relationship Manager for Defined Contributions

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

ERISA Team Leader

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

DC Plan Administrator

Heller Pension Associates, Inc.
(Remote / Hyde Park NY / Miami FL)

Heller Pension Associates, Inc. logo

Senior ERISA Compliance Analyst

Employee Fiduciary, LLC
(Remote)

Employee Fiduciary, LLC logo

Senior Client Success Manager

Independent Retirement
(Remote / Portland OR)

Independent Retirement logo

Retirement Compliance Consultant

Navia Benefit Solutions
(Remote / Fresno CA)

Navia Benefit Solutions logo

Relationship Manager/ Actuary

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Executive Assistant / Sales Support

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Senior Counsel - Benefits and Total Rewards

Tyson Foods
(Springdale AR)

Tyson Foods logo

Plan Consultant II

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Installation & Document Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Publications

LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

District Court Confirms Only Named Plan Administrator May Face § 1132(c) Penalties
Roberts Disability Law Link to more items from this source
Nov. 25, 2025

"The court reaffirmed the Tenth Circuit's strict interpretation of Section 1132(c), holding that only the designated plan administrator -- as named in the governing plan documents -- can be subject to penalties. Because the complaint identified Union Pacific officers as the plan administrators, and MetLife acted only as a claims administrator and alleged agent, the court dismissed the Section 1132(c) claim against MetLife." [Mayor v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., itself & as administrator of Union Pac. Corp. Nonagreement Life Ins. Plan 0149653, No. 25-0012 (D. Utah Nov. 21, 2025)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).