Featured Jobs
|
July Business Services
|
|
Retirement Plan Installation & Document Manager Fringe Benefit Group
|
|
Senior Counsel - Benefits and Total Rewards Tyson Foods
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Executive Assistant / Sales Support M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
|
|
Senior ERISA Compliance Analyst Employee Fiduciary, LLC
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Heller Pension Associates, Inc.
|
|
Retirement Compliance Consultant Navia Benefit Solutions
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
Free Publications
|
|
Eleventh Circuit Rules Insurer's Interpretation of Preexisting Condition Provision Was Unreasonable
Kantor & Kantor 
Nov. 26, 2025 "The court ruled that Reliance's interpretation was unreasonable 'because it completely elides the distinction between receiving medical care for symptoms not inconsistent with a preexisting condition and receiving medical care for a preexisting condition itself.'... The court deemed this position 'unreasonable -- full stop.' ... In the end, the court viewed Reliance as attempting to rewrite its policy after the fact[.]" [Johnson v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., No. 23-13443 (11th Cir. Nov. 21, 2025)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |