Featured Jobs
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Eleventh Circuit Rules Insurer's Interpretation of Preexisting Condition Provision Was Unreasonable
Kantor & Kantor 
Nov. 26, 2025 "The court ruled that Reliance's interpretation was unreasonable 'because it completely elides the distinction between receiving medical care for symptoms not inconsistent with a preexisting condition and receiving medical care for a preexisting condition itself.'... The court deemed this position 'unreasonable -- full stop.' ... In the end, the court viewed Reliance as attempting to rewrite its policy after the fact[.]" [Johnson v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., No. 23-13443 (11th Cir. Nov. 21, 2025)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |