Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Employee Benefits Attorney

Reid & Riege PC
(Remote / Hartford CT / Hybrid)

Reid & Riege PC logo

Client Relationship Manager (401k)

Prime Benefits
(Remote / Baltimore MD)

Prime Benefits logo

Regional Vice President

Loren D. Stark Company
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company logo

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

AI Retirement Plan Administrator

Well-Funded Retirement-Focused AI Startup
(Remote / Cambridge MA / NY / Hybrid)

Well-Funded Retirement-Focused AI Startup logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Eleventh Circuit Rules Insurer's Interpretation of Preexisting Condition Provision Was Unreasonable
Kantor & Kantor Link to more items from this source
Nov. 26, 2025

"The court ruled that Reliance's interpretation was unreasonable 'because it completely elides the distinction between receiving medical care for symptoms not inconsistent with a preexisting condition and receiving medical care for a preexisting condition itself.'... The court deemed this position 'unreasonable -- full stop.' ... In the end, the court viewed Reliance as attempting to rewrite its policy after the fact[.]" [Johnson v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., No. 23-13443 (11th Cir. Nov. 21, 2025)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).