Featured Jobs
|
Participant Services Representative BPAS
|
|
PCS Retirement
|
|
RetirementPlans.com, LLC
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Participant Services Representative I - Health & Welfare BPAS
|
|
Hydro
|
|
Reid & Riege PC
|
|
BPAS
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Second Circuit Sides with Employer in Appeal of Withdrawal Liability After Union Representation Change
Miller & Chevalier
Mar. 10, 2026 "[T]he Second Circuit held that 'unfunded vested benefits allocable to the employer,' as used in Section 1415(c), refers to the entire amount of liabilities transferred when an employer withdraws pursuant to Sections 1415(a) and 1415(c).... The decision represents a significant clarification of how withdrawal liability must be calculated when an employer is forced to withdraw from a [multiemployer plan] due to a union representation change." [Mar-Can Transportation Co., Inc. v. Loc. 854 Pension Fund, No. 24-1431 (2d Cir. Feb. 18, 2026)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |