Featured Jobs
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Retirement - Client Services Manager Navia Benefits
|
|
Associate Sales Representative Loren D. Stark Company
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
NestEggs Retirement Plan Services Inc
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
CalcAir
|
|
The Pension Design Group
|
|
July Business Services
|
Free Publications
|
|
|
Second Circuit Sides with Employer in Appeal of Withdrawal Liability After Union Representation Change
Miller & Chevalier
Mar. 10, 2026 "[T]he Second Circuit held that 'unfunded vested benefits allocable to the employer,' as used in Section 1415(c), refers to the entire amount of liabilities transferred when an employer withdraws pursuant to Sections 1415(a) and 1415(c).... The decision represents a significant clarification of how withdrawal liability must be calculated when an employer is forced to withdraw from a [multiemployer plan] due to a union representation change." [Mar-Can Transportation Co., Inc. v. Loc. 854 Pension Fund, No. 24-1431 (2d Cir. Feb. 18, 2026)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |