Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Analyst - DC Plans

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Plan Administrator

Atlantic Pension Services Inc
(Remote / Kennett Square PA / DE / MD / NJ / NY / SC / TN)

Atlantic Pension Services Inc logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

3(16) Administrator

401K Safe
(Remote)

401K Safe logo

Quality Review Specialist

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Regional Sales Director

BPAS
(Remote / CA)

BPAS logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Sixth Circuit Says Reasonable Assumptions Must Be Used for QJSA 'Actuarial Equivalence'
Cheiron Link to more items from this source
Mar. 23, 2026

"Due in part to litigation pending in other Circuits and the lengthy dissent in the Sixth Circuit decision, the plans may seek to settle the cases or may request a re-hearing before the entire Sixth Circuit court of appeals. Even if the re-hearing request is not granted, the cases will still go back to the relevant district court for a determination of whether the actuarial assumptions are unreasonable.... Note that the decision pertains only to the QJSA determination, and does not address early retirement calculations." [Reichert v. Kellogg, No. 24-1442, consol. Watt v. FedEx, No. 24-5945 (6th Cir. Mar. 16, 2026)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).