Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Compliance Consultant

Navia Benefit Solutions
(Remote / Fresno CA)

Navia Benefit Solutions logo

Executive Assistant / Sales Support

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Contributions

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Senior Counsel - Benefits and Total Rewards

Tyson Foods
(Springdale AR)

Tyson Foods logo

Senior ERISA Compliance Analyst

Employee Fiduciary, LLC
(Remote)

Employee Fiduciary, LLC logo

Retirement Plan Installation & Document Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

Relationship Manager/ Actuary

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

ERISA Team Leader

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Plan Consultant II

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

DC Plan Administrator

Heller Pension Associates, Inc.
(Remote / Hyde Park NY / Miami FL)

Heller Pension Associates, Inc. logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Publications

LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Ninth Circuit Clarifies Withdrawal Liability Rules for Certain Industries
Proskauer Link to more items from this source
Apr. 10, 2026

"The Ninth Circuit recently issued a pair of decisions clarifying how the rules governing withdrawal liability apply to employers in certain industries. In [one case] the Court held that an employer did not withdraw from a multiemployer pension plan, and thus did not owe withdrawal liability, because the employer's asbestos abatement work qualified for the 'building and construction industry' exemption. And in [a second decision], the Court held that the plan primarily covered employees in the entertainment industry because the majority of employees in the plan performed at least some entertainment-related work." 
[Walker Speciality Constr. Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of the Constr. Ind. and Lab. Jt. Pension Trust for S. Nev., No. 24-1560 (9th Cir. Jan. 5, 2026); Nevada Resort Ass'n-Int'l Alliance of Theatrical Stage Emps. & Moving Picture Mach. Operators of the US & Canada Loc. 720 Pension Tr. v. JB Viva Vegas, LP, No. 24-2791 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).