Featured Jobs
|
Product Counsel, ERISA & Operations Human Interest
|
|
Retirement Plan Documents Specialist Loren D. Stark Company
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Senior Retirement Plan Administrator Daybright Financial
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Client Relationship Manager (401k) Prime Benefits
|
|
BPAS
|
|
July Business Services LLC
|
|
Senior Retirement Plan Administrator PlanPerfect, Inc.
|
Free Publications
|
|
|
Prohibited Transaction Claims After Cunningham v. Cornell: Have District Courts Responded to the Supreme Court's Suggestions?
Mayer Brown
June 3, 2026 "Just over one year ago, the US Supreme Court addressed the pleading requirements for prohibited-transaction claims under ERISA ... The Court recognized the 'serious concern' that its decision could lead to an 'avalanche of meritless litigation,' and suggested five tools that district courts could use to screen out meritless, 'barebones' suits.... While the Supreme Court's five suggestions have not been widely adopted in the year since Cunningham, three of them have been utilized at least once, showing that courts are willing to use these tools in the right circumstances." MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |