The BenefitsLink Newsletter -
Retirement Plans Edition November 15, 2000 Today's sponsor is The Plan Sales System (click on banner for more information) "Duty Of Consistency" Subjected Taxpayer To Income Tax On Funds That Were Not Timely Rolled Over Excerpt: "A taxpayer was liable for income taxes on distributions received from an annuity account that previously had not been timely rolled over from a defined benefit plan to that account. This was the decision of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Estate of Hilda Ashman v. Commissioner." (Spencernet) ASPA Files Comments With IRS on Latest Loan Regulations Topics addressed include leaves of absence, refinancing, multiple loans, withholding, and the permitted cure period. (American Society of Pension Actuaries) Sixth Circuit Upholds Conviction Of Plan Trustee Who Embezzled $3 Million From Pension Plan Excerpt: "The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has upheld the conviction and prison sentence of a pension plan trustee who embezzled more than $3 million from the plan. The case is U.S. v. Krimsky." (Spencernet) CREF to Stick with Tobacco Investments Excerpt: "The College Retirement Equities Fund, which manages about $176 billion in equities as part of the TIAA-CREF teachers pension system, will stick with one of its more controversial investments -- tobacco stocks. A proposal seeking the divestiture of tobacco investments was rejected by the fund's participants in a 73.7 percent to 21.1 percent vote." (Reuters via Yahoo! News) Students Urge CREF to Get Philip Morris Off its Board Excerpt: "As educators who are invested in the world's largest private pension fund vote on whether to divest of tobacco stocks at the CREF annual meeting, students on college campuses across the country are pressuring the retirement fund to remove a Philip Morris decisionmaker from its board." (PRNewswire, via Yahoo! Finance) CalPERS Sets Social Investment Standards for Overseas Investments (Reuters via Yahoo! Finance) (Following also appears in Welfare Plans Edition) The Duty To Inform And Fiduciary Breaches: The "New Frontier" In ERISA Litigation (Howard Shapiro and Robert Rachal of McCalla Thompson LLP) 3d Cir. Uses "Duty to Inform" Theory to Eviscerate Plan Administrator's Ability To Intepret Plan Excerpt: "In Harte v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. ... the court addressed a familiar fact pattern: A plan administrator's interpretation of an ambiguous plan provision resulted in the denial of benefits.... But then [the court] applied a fiduciary 'duty to inform' rationale to conclude the plan administrator may have breached a duty to inform the participant of this interpretation in time for the participant to act." (Robert Rachal, Esq. of McCalla Thompson LLP)
Subscribe to the Retirement Plans Edition, too (click) Copyright 2000 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. Feel free to forward this email to friends, colleagues or clients, if no fee is paid to you and the email is forwarded in its entirety. Thanks! BenefitsLink is a trademark of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., published by Dave Baker with much help from Mary Hall and lots of friends. To subscribe (free): visit https://benefitslink.com/newsletter - or the person desiring to subscribe can send an email to listmanager@postmastergeneral.com, with this as the subject of the email: subscribe BLwelfare We have an online archive of prior issues at http://www.postmastergeneral.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?list=BLwelfare |
|