Employee Benefits Jobs
|
Webcasts and Conferences
|
|
|
|
Hand-picked links to the web's best news articles, official guidance, jobs, webcasts and more.
|
[Guidance Overview]
ACA Shared Responsibility Reporting: The Key to IRS's Penalty Tax Assessment and the Data Key to the Employer's Defense (PDF)
"One day of coverage equals a month of coverage reported under Section 6055, but this contrasts with the reporting for Section 6056 on the same form, which treats one day of coverage missed during a calendar month as no offer of coverage for such month except in special circumstances such as termination of employment.... Even if an employer decides to use one of the alternative methods of complying with reporting to avoid determining full-time status in one year, the preservation of the data permits an employer to change methods in future years if it's not able to continue to meet one of the alternate or safe harbors in a future year[.]"
(Winstead PC via Bloomberg BNA Pension & Benefits Daily)
|
[Guidance Overview]
Small Employer Health Insurance Credit Final Regs Retain Uniform Percentage Rules
"The final regulations clarify how the uniform percentage requirement provisions are applied if SHOP dependent coverage is offered.... A tobacco surcharge and amounts paid by the employer to cover the surcharge are not included in premiums for purposes of calculating the uniform percentage requirement. The uniform percentage requirement is also applied without regard to an employee's payment of all or part of the surcharge.... Seasonal employees continue to be defined as workers who perform labor or services on a seasonal basis, including retail workers employed exclusively during holiday seasons."
(Wolters Kluwer Law & Business)
|
Understanding the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby Decision
"What Coverage Does the Affordable Care Act Require? ... What Happens if a Plan Does Not Cover Contraceptives? ... Are any Plans Exempt From the Contraceptive Coverage Requirement? ... Why Did the Supreme Court Agree With Hobby Lobby? ... How Does This Decision Impact Publicly Traded Companies?"
(Thompson Hine)
|
Impact of Hobby Lobby: Closely Held Corporations May Object to ACA's Contraceptive Mandate
"The Hobby Lobby ruling provides a narrow opportunity for owners of a closely held corporation to object to the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act for religious reasons. Assuming that the HHS makes the same system that it uses for religious not-for-profits available to closely held for-profit companies with religious objections, this ruling should have little practical effect for any affected employees, as insurance carriers will be required to cover these contraceptive services without sharing any of the cost with the employee or the employer."
(Goldberg Segalla)
|
|
Hobby Lobby Decision Cuts Unique Exemption Into ACA Contraceptive Coverage Requirement
"While it is possible that some owners of closely held for-profit companies might change their businesses to make them faith-based companies, and then begin to pick and choose which mandated benefits are objectionable to them as owners (probably the expensive ones), it is unlikely that many businesses will do this.... Accordingly ... this decision has only a very limited practical impact on most businesses and their benefit plans."
(Fox Rothschild LLP)
|
U.S. to Supreme Court: Don't Expand Hobby Lobby Exemption
"The Obama administration, arguing that the steps it has taken to protect religious objections to birth control by non-profit colleges, hospitals and other charities satisfy federal law, urged the Supreme Court on Wednesday not to expand the exemption. A religious college in Illinois is not entitled to the temporary aid that the Court gave to a Colorado charity in January, the newly filed brief contended. This was the first court filing by the federal government in the wake of Monday's ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, and it made clear that officials will continue to resist efforts by non-profit religious institutions to gain a complete exemption from the pregnancy prevention mandates of the new federal health care law."
(SCOTUSblog)
|
How the ACA Will Affect Total Rewards
"The cost-related and legal ramifications of health care reform present serious challenges to organizations' ability to operate efficiently. Most employers expect to make changes to their health care benefit program for all active employees and retirees by 2016. Savvy organizations are preparing by looking closely at their total rewards strategy and employee value proposition."
(Towers Watson)
|
Healthcare Premiums Rise at Big Insurers, Fall at Small Rivals
"In nine of the 10 states that have filed their proposed 2015 insurance rates, the largest health insurers are increasing premiums between 8.5 percent and 22.8 percent for next year ... These proposals are a reflection of rising prescription-drug costs, medical inflation (around 5.4 percent for 2014) and the ACA's fees and coverage mandates, according to insurance companies."
(National Center for Policy Analysis)
|
Risk Corridors: A Carrot for Insurers, or a Bailout?
"It's in the best interests of employers, particularly small businesses, for risk corridors to work as intended, observes Larry McNeely, policy director for the National Coalition on Health Care in Washington, D.C. His point is that helping stabilize the rates of public exchanges would provide their employees with another viable option for obtaining health insurance if they choose that avenue."
(Employee Benefit Adviser)
|
[Opinion]
The Illogic of Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
"The [Hobby Lobby] ruling raises the question of why, uniquely in the industrialized world, Americans have for so long favored an arrangement in health insurance that endows their employers with the quasi-parental power to choose the options that employees may be granted in the market for health insurance.... Furthermore, the arrangement induces employers to intervene in many other ways in their employees' personal life -- for example, in wellness programs that can range from the benign to annoyingly intrusive, depending upon the employers' wishes."
(Uwe E. Reinhardt in The New York Times; subscription may be required)
|
Press Releases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
Phone (407) 644-4146
Fax (407) 644-2151
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
Copyright © 2014
BenefitsLink.com, Inc. -- but feel free to forward this
newsletter without further permission from us, if you do not
modify the newsletter in any way (including this lower
portion).
All materials contained in this newsletter are
protected by United States copyright law and may not be
reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed,
published or broadcast without the prior written
permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of
third party materials, the owner of that content. You
may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or
other notice from copies of the content.
Links to Web sites other than those owned by
BenefitsLink.com, Inc. are offered as a service to
readers. The editorial staff of BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
was not involved in their production and is not
responsible for their content.
Useful links:
|