|
|
|
|
DOL Advisory Opinion Addresses Small Retirement Account Balance Auto-Portability Program
"The DOL explained that plan fiduciaries would be subject to ERISA's fiduciary standards -- and any associated liability -- when they opt to participate in the RCH Program under which plan accounts will be transferred to default IRAs.... [Advisory Opinion 2018‑01A] clarified, however, that neither the plan fiduciaries choosing to participate in the RCH Program nor the fiduciaries of the new employer plan that agrees to accept the roll-in transactions would be considered fiduciaries for purposes of the transfer of assets in the default IRA into the new employer's plan."
Buck
|
IRS Moves to Mandatory Electronic Submission for Retirement Plan VCP Corrections
"Corrections through the new pay.gov procedure may be applied for beginning January 1, 2019.... From January 1, 2019, through March 31, 2019, the IRS will accept either electronic submissions through pay.gov or traditional paper submissions. Paper submissions that are postmarked on or after April 1, 2019, will not be accepted.... All VCP submissions made on or after [April 1, 2019] must be made through pay.gov. These payment rules also apply to plans assessed sanctions through the IRS' Audit Closing Agreement Program (Audit CAP). Plans that correct failures using the Self-Correction Program (SCP) are not required to submit to the IRS or pay a fee."
Ascensus
|
Challenges Too Many 401(k) Plan Sponsors Don't Consider
"[1] Understanding the extent of legal liability ... [2] Must proactively decide plan hardship provisions ... [3] Bad fees vs. Good fees ... [4] The link between employee financial fitness and company profitability ... [5] Don't know what they don't know."
Fiduciary News
|
401(k) Deposit Rules for Employers Demystified
"How to fix it if you broke the rules: [1] Make the deposit immediately ... [2] Make up for lost earnings ... [3] IRS corrective programs ... [4] Change your process (keep this from happening again)."
ForUsAll
|
Fiduciary Breach Suit Against Caterpillar Record Keeper Comes to an End
"Plaintiffs and defendants agreed to drop litigation in a lawsuit by Caterpillar Inc. 401(k) participants alleging the plan's record keeper and an affiliate violated their fiduciary duties when they subcontracted a financial advice service to Financial Engines."
Pensions & Investments
|
Understanding the Central States Pension Plan's Tale of Woe
"Had the plan been well-run and properly funded, and had principles of multi-employer plan design and the relevant legislation been designed to ensure long-term solvency rather than relying on new generations of contributors to make up for losses, Central States would have weathered these storms. But Central States was missing all this.... They had flaws in their plan design. And they were neither well-run nor properly funded."
Forbes
|
|
|
CBO's Long-Term Social Security Projections: Changes Since 2017 and Comparisons With the Social Security Trustees' Projections (PDF)
20 pages. "The projected 75-year actuarial balance ... has not changed as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) since last year ... As a percentage of taxable payroll, the projected 75-year actuarial balance has improved slightly ... CBO projects larger deficits in Social Security's finances than do the Social Security Trustees. That difference is largely explained by CBO's and the trustees' different projections of several key inputs into estimates of the system's finances: the population, earnings subject to Social Security payroll taxes, real interest rates."
Congressional Budget Office [CBO]
|
|
Benefits in General
|
Limitations Periods in Benefit Plans: Guidance from the Courts (PDF)
"ERISA contains specific limitations periods for fiduciary claims ... But ERISA is silent for nonfiduciary suits such as health benefit claims, claims of interference with ERISA rights or document request claims.... To avoid the need to consult state law, a plan may specify that a claimant must bring suit within a certain period after a triggering event ... or within a certain period after completing the internal appeals process. Courts have long upheld such provisions, though courts in different jurisdictions have varied in their approach."
benefits magazine, a publication of the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans [IFEBP]
|
Can ERISA Plans Require That Fiduciary Claims Be Arbitrated? Should They? (PDF)
"Despite ERISA's endorsement of arbitration for certain issues, breach of fiduciary duty claims, which tend to involve greater damages and tend to attract the most media attention, are not arbitrated. One possible reason is that ... arbitration is not all it is chalked up to be -- for sophisticated fiduciary disputes, arbitration may in fact be just as time consuming, just as expensive, and less likely to lead to a just outcome."
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
|
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans
|
Tax Reform Elevates Split Dollar Arrangements as Incentive Plan
"[T]he potential exists to use split dollar plans to mitigate the significant additional expense of the new 21 percent excise tax, making it even more favorable as a part of an executive compensation package. The remuneration subject to the new tax in Section 4960 includes deferred compensation benefits that are includible in income (some exceptions apply). Split dollar plans are considered loans pursuant to Section 7872 and, therefore, are not included in remuneration."
Fulcrum Partners LLC
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Distribution Timing When Participant Is Rehired
Plan document reads: "(6) Return to employment. A Participant may not receive a distribution based on Separation from Service, or continue any Installment distribution based on a prior Separation from Service, if, prior to the time the Trustee actually makes the distribution, the Participant returns to employment with the Employer." At issue is the meaning of the phrase "Participant returns to employment" in the last sentence. I contend that the employee has returned on the date he or she begins working. Another party interprets that the employee has "returned to employment" if he or she has been notified they are being called back to work. Who's right?
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|