|
|
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Answers for Employers About California's State-Mandated Retirement Plan
"What is CalSavers? ... Which employers must participate? ... When is it effective? ... What are the advantages of participating in the CalSavers program? ... What are the drawbacks of the CalSavers law? ... How does an employer participate in CalSavers? ... What are the penalties for failing to comply with CalSavers? ... What is the status of CalSavers? ... Do any other states or cities have similar laws?"
Jackson Lewis P.C.
|
Categorical Conflict of Interest Does Not Alter Standard of Review of Benefit Denials
"The Second Circuit held that plaintiffs' allegations that the defendant suffered from a 'categorical potential conflict of interest' -- because it both funded the plan and was the claim's decision-maker -- did not affect the application of the arbitrary and capricious standard of review in the absence of a showing by the plaintiffs that the conflict actually affected the plan administrator's decision-making." [Kirkendall v. Halliburton, Inc., No. 17-3487 (2d Cir. Jan. 24, 2019)]
Proskauer's ERISA Practice Center
|
|
|
[Advert.]

For over 20 years, we've helped employers find the best-informed candidates to fill their benefits job openings -- learn more!
|
|
|
Ensuring a Clean Recordkeeper Conversion
"[It's] a good idea for plan sponsor to conduct 'a mini audit of the plan before the conversion.' ... Ensuring data from the old service provider is accurate is also key ... One of the most common glitches ... is with moving assets from the old recordkeeper to the new one.... Some funds have a 12-month put or other contractual timeline requiring advanced notice before moving out of them."
PLANSPONSOR; free registration may be required
|
Public Pension Plan Sponsors Struggle to Contribute Sufficiently to Plans
"Between 2005 and 2016, employer contributions to 133 large state and municipal pension plans more than doubled from $42.4 billion to $88.1 billion; however, during that same period, the unfunded liabilities of these plans grew 245% from $290 billion in 2005 to $1.0 trillion in 2016 ... Most of the plans studied received insufficient contributions to reduce their unfunded liabilities[.]"
PLANSPONSOR; free registration required
|
Many Furloughed Federal Workers Withdrew from Retirement Funds
"More than one quarter of the 800,000 federal employees who were affected by the federal government shutdown withdrew money from their retirement funds to help make it through the 35 days in which they did not see a paycheck ... [F]our in 10 of these federal workers borrowed money from family or friends, while 20 percent took out a bank loan to help tide them over."
InsuranceNewsNet.com
|
Top Concern During Retirement: Going Broke
"Running out of money is the top financial concern of clients planning for retirement, cited by 30 percent of CPA financial planners.... Nearly half (48 percent) of clients have expressed concerns about outliving their money ... [T]hat outweighs the 39 percent of planners who have concerns about their clients outliving their money.... [H]ealthcare costs (77 percent), market fluctuations (53 percent) and unexpected costs (50 percent) were cited as the top issues."
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [AICPA]
|
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans
|
|
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Contribution to DC Plan Exceeded Section 404 Limit: Idea for Fixing It
We have a client with a 401(k)/profit sharing plan that has a large nondeductible contribution amount for 2018. We can reduce it a bit by pushing a post-year-end deposit into the 2019 fiscal year deduction. Another option may be to retroactively amend the plan to bring in an excluded class, and employees who had not met initial eligibility, and give them a profit sharing allocation (the plan is not Top Heavy). I know this would require approval under VCP to be sure it's acceptable. If the client were to do that (assuming waiving the VCP submission), what would likely be considered a "meaningful benefit"?
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Amending Matching Contribution Provisions to Add Last Day Employment/Minimum Hours Requirement
Plan sponsor currently does not impose any last day employment/minimum hours of service requirement to receive a match. Match is discretionary and is only made at the end of the plan year. Plan sponsor wants to add a last day employment/minimum hours requirement for 2019. Can that be done effective March 1, 2019 if it only applies after March 1? For example, plan sponsor wants to apply current rules for all contributions for January and February, but impose the last day employment/minimum hours requirement for any match made any time after March 1.
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
All in the Family: Fidelity Bond Required?
Plan's only employees/participants are a husband/wife and 3 children. Assets are held in FBO self directed accounts for each, but there are also non-qualified assets (mortgages and some other real estate), which are segregated in the owner (husband's) name, so his account is the only one affected by their value. Is he required to have a fidelity bond for the non-qualified assets? There are employees other than family members.
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
BenefitsLink Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587. Copyright 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
Privacy Policy
|