|
|
Complaint Alleges That Fidelity Charged Improper Fees
"Plan fiduciaries, regardless of whether they use Fidelity as their record keeper, should take the following steps: [1] Review and analyze investments and fee disclosures for investments (including any footnotes in fine print); [2] Ask their record keepers whether there are any nondisclosed fees similar to infrastructure fees paid by Fidelity; [3] Understand and analyze the employer's/plan sponsor's/fiduciary's own fiduciary obligations; [4] Consider whether additional actions may be appropriate to further the interests of plan participants, including changing the fund line-up or participating in litigation; and [5] Document the above steps."
Husch Blackwell
|
U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear USC's Appeal in ERISA Arbitration Case
"The Ninth Circuit's decision held that the dispute falls outside the arbitration agreements that USC employees signed because the parties consented only to arbitrate claims brought on their own behalf and the employees' claims were brought on behalf of the ERISA plans. As a result of the decision, the litigation's discovery phase will continue to proceed in federal court." [Munro v. Univ. of So. Cal., No. 17-55550 (9th Cir. July 24, 2018; cert. denied Feb. 19, 2019)]
Schlichter Bogard & Denton
|
|
|
Multistate Private-Sector Retirement Pact Getting Some Serious Attention
"The basic idea is for interested states to be able to tap into programs already built rather than starting from scratch.... So far, seven states -- including some that have already passed secure choice legislation -- are considering legislative language allowing for such partnerships, and many other private-sector retirement bills being considered this year would allow treasurers or other officials to decide whether collaborating with another state program is the most feasible approach."
Pensions & Investments
|
There Are No Guarantees if You Self-Insure Your Retirement, Part 2
"[T]he 4% Rule [and] IRS RMD approach (or any other Strategic Withdrawal Plan) don't work with [Qualified Longevity Annuity Contracts (QLACs)] ... to provide a reasonable spending budget, as these approaches don't coordinate spending with other sources of retirement income. And while Monte Carlo models ... may be able to incorporate non-linear payment streams and indicate how a QLAC may positively affect the probability of success of meeting a certain spending goal, they will generally not tell you how to adjust your spending budget each year to keep on track."
Ken Steiner, FSA Retired
|
[Opinion]
Is It Ever a Good Idea to Hold Company Stock in a 401(k)?
"At the portfolio level, heavily weighting single stock -- any stock -- has the potential to make that portfolio more volatile than one that's more diffuse.... Employees who invest heavily in company stock have both their human capital and financial capital riding on the fortunes of a single company ... If you're matched on your 401(k) contribution in the form of company stock, it's a best practice to periodically liquidate those holdings and deploy the cash into better-diversified positions within your plan."
Christine Benz, in Morningstar
|
|
Benefits in General
|
Summary Plan Descriptions: You Gotta Provide Them, So Make the Most of Them
"If your participants don't understand the information contained in their SPDs, they may make unsound, and potentially costly, benefits decisions. To determine whether your SPDs have readability issues, you should re-read the SPDs from a participant's viewpoint ... Providing updated SPDs every five or 10 years to former retirement plan participants with vested benefits, retirees receiving benefits, and beneficiaries receiving benefits may seem like an unnecessary cost, given that those individuals won't be affected by most plan changes. To lessen the burden on plan administrators, the ERISA rules include an alternative distribution method for such situations."
Foley & Lardner LLP
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Merging a MEP into a Single Employer Plan
Our company purchased an organization with a MEP last year and we would like to merge the 20 facilities/employer plans into our single employer Plan. Can we handle it like a standard trust-to-trust conversion -- addressing any protected benefits? I heard there are special consideration for MEPs, however I couldn't locate any conversation on unique issues we need to consider.
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
BenefitsLink Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587. Copyright 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
Privacy Policy
|