|
|
[Guidance Overview]
A Close Look at the SEC's New Regulation Best Interest and Related Rules and Guidance
"Although the components of the broker's duty to retail customers is similar to and to some extent based on the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's suitability rule, ... Regulation BI provides a greater level of detail around avoiding or remediating conflicts of interest, as well as other elements of the duty.... Existing brokers must file Form CRS through Web CRD by June 30, 2020, and deliver a copy to retail investors no later than July 30, 2020."
Goodwin Procter
|
[Advert.]
ftwilliam.com Distribution Tracking Software

Our cutting-edge Distribution Tracking Software, built by retirement service providers, makes distribution preparation and tracking faster and more efficient. Know exactly where each distribution is so nothing slips through the cracks. Learn more!
|
[Guidance Overview]
Fiduciary Duties: The SEC Weighs In Again (PDF)
"[T]he Final Interpretation recognizes that disclosures should be 'clear and detailed enough for the client to make an informed decision to consent' and notes that whether a client has provided informed consent will depend on the facts and circumstances, including the sophistication of the client.... The SEC's recognition of the important differences between retail and institutional clients will likely be important to the application of the Final Interpretation."
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
|
The SEC's New Investment Advice Rules Are Here
"BDs and RIAs who provide participant level advice services to retirement plans will be reviewing the rule and working quickly to evaluate and implement any necessary changes. Many have been preparing since the draft rule came out last year. If you have participant advice built into your plan, we recommend you: [1] Request the advice provider comply with the new regulations. [2] Determine if the advice provider appears to be taking proper action. [3] Document this process in your fiduciary files."
Lockton
|
Will the SEC's Regulation Best Interest Have a Significant Impact?
"For broker/dealers, this rule raises questions about how to advise on rollovers, and how to demonstrate to a regulator that a rollover is in the best interest of the client. For instance: The benefit of a rollover may in part be due to the value of advice or asset-allocation recommendations that match a client's goals.... [In] some cases moving assets to a higher-cost IRA from a lower-cost, employer-sponsored plan might make sense if the advice adds more value to the customer than it costs.... [B]rokers may need tools to help evaluate the cost of the employer plan versus the value of putting the individual into an IRA, which offers more flexibility and potential for advice but at higher costs."
Morningstar
|
Settlement of MFS Excessive Fee Suit Includes Plan Design Changes
"The lawsuit had alleged that MFS defendants seeded the company's own retirement plans primarily with MFS investment offerings, without investigating whether plan participants would be better served by investments managed by unaffiliated companies.... Beyond the monetary payment to the plan, ... the plans' qualified default investment alternative options will be one or more target-date funds that are unaffiliated with MFS ... [and] MFS will retain a third-party investment consultant ... to provide an annual evaluation of the plans' investment lineup and review the plans' investment policy statement."
PLANSPONSOR; free registration may be required
|
[Advert.]

Reach the right candidate for your company's job opening! Put your job ad in front of our 24,000+ newsletter readers and on our web site -- the employee benefits community's job board over 20 years. Place your job ad now.
|
Valuation and UBTI Issues of IRA Direct-Owned Real Estate
"[D]irect-owned IRA real estate increases the likelihood of running afoul of the prohibited transaction rules. IRA owners, for instance, are prohibited from personally using their IRA-owned real estate, or performing even the smallest of repairs on the property themselves. Purchasing or leasing such properties personally is also off-limits, even when such arrangements are done as an 'arms-length' transaction at a fair market value/rate. But the list of potential challenges doesn't stop there."
Nerd's Eye View
|
State and Local Government Contributions to Statewide Pension Plans: FY 2017 (PDF)
"[On] a dollar-weighted basis, the percentage of required contributions that was paid by public employers increased for the fifth consecutive year, while pension costs continued to grow at a slower pace than previous years.... Pension spending levels, however, vary widely among states and are actuarially sufficient for some pension plans and insufficient for others."
National Association of State Retirement Administrators [NASRA]
|
|
|
Retirement Planning Assumptions to Avoid
"[1] You can always keep working.... [2] You'll need only 70-80% of your pre-retirement income ... [3] You'll be in a lower tax bracket once you retire.... [4] The stock market will save you.... [5] There's always Social Security."
Charles Schwab
|
|
|
|
Benefits in General
|
DOL Requires Electronic Filing for Top Hat, Apprenticeship, and Training Benefits
"Failure to submit the top hat plan statement does not result in penalties but does subject the plan to expanded reporting and disclosure requirements. Similarly, welfare benefit plans that provide only apprenticeship or training benefits, or both, are exempt from reporting and disclosure if a notice is [submitted] to the DOL and the plan administrator discloses certain information to employees participating, or eligible to enroll, in the plan.... Effective August 16, 2019, the final regulations require electronic submission of these notices and statements through DOL's website."
Buck
|
|
|
Panel Discussion: Current Issues in Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
"What EBEC issue has had the greatest impact on your clients in the past 12 months? ... What is the most interesting EBEC matter on your desk right now and what are the issues involved? ... Are there any EBEC issues that are on the horizon that could significantly impact your clients and/or your practice? Can you describe the potential impact?"
Thomson Reuters Practical Law
|
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans
|
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred Comp Plans: The 401(k) Excess Contribution Solution
"A 401(k) refund immediately becomes unplanned taxable income for the employees, and potentially a lost opportunity to collect company matching dollars for 401(k) savings.... Nonqualified deferred compensation plans (NQDC) can be designed to allow plan participants to defer an amount of their base salary equal to the refund, to create a tax neutral event for the year in which the refund occurs."
Fulcrum Partners LLC
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Trust Named as Beneficiary for Post-Retirement Death Benefit
Non-ERISA DB plan -- a public school. A participant who is retiring wants to receive her retirement benefit in an option that used her spouse's DOB as the basis to calculate the various optional forms of benefit. But, she wants to reflect their REVOCABLE trust as beneficiary. I know this wouldn't qualify under the RMD rules, but is it allowable under the "regular" rules? Is it allowable for the plan to calculate the retirement options using the spouse as measuring life, yet have the death benefits paid to a revocable trust (even assuming the spouse is sole beneficiary under the trust)?
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Terminated Plan Did Not Fund Safe Harbor Before Distributing All Plan Assets
A restaurant client had a safe harbor 401k. They terminated the plan in 2017. However, they were supposed to fund the 2017 safe harbor contributions prior to distributing all of the plan assets. They only funded about $5,000 of the $15,000 that was due for the participants. However, during 2018 they paid out all current account balances and the platform shows zero for the plan balance. What is the procedure for making the participants whole at this point? They're anxious to file the final return, but there are still contributions due participants. I don't think they have the funds to put into the plan.
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Is This a Document Failure or an Operational Failure?
Our client has a 401k plan. We (the TPA) just discovered an error in the way the client has been calculating deferrals. Prior to the EGTRRA restatement, bonuses were excluded for deferral purposes. When restating for EGTRRA, we (the TPA) did not code the adoption agreement correctly to exclude the bonus. So both the EGTRRA and PPA restatements were written to have deferrals deducted from bonus. The client has never deducted deferrals from bonus and that has been their intent for over 15 years. Do we have an operational failure or a document failure? Or is this a scrivener's error? What is the best way to correct? Do we have to go to VCP?
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
BenefitsLink Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587. Copyright 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
Privacy Policy
|