Lowe's Defense Fails to Get ERISA Suit Dismissed
"The fiduciary breach lawsuit accuses plan fiduciaries of mapping $1 billion into a fund that lagged peer performance and was unpopular in the marketplace.... Following recommendations from a Magistrate Judge a federal judge from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina granted in part and denied in part Lowe's Companies' motion to dismiss[.]" [Reetz v. Lowe's Companies, Inc., No. 18-075 (W.D.N.C. Sep. 6, 2019)]
PLANSPONSOR; free registration may be required
|
Ninth Circuit Permits Arbitration in Case Alleging ERISA Fiduciary Breach
"The decision of the Ninth Circuit is limited, focusing primarily on the court's reversal of its ban on arbitration in connection with ERISA fiduciary breach claims brought on behalf of a plan. The memorandum provides helpful insight into the panel's view that arbitration, including arbitration on an individual basis, should be permitted if the plan's sponsor or decision-maker so chooses. However, it does not delve into the nuances of all available arguments against arbitration in the ERISA context, such as the argument that arbitration on an individual basis is an elimination of the participants' explicit right to file a claim on behalf of the plan as a whole." [Dorman v. The Charles Schwab Corp.,
No. 18-15281 (9th Cir. Aug. 20, 2019; also unpub. memo. opinion)]
Winston & Strawn LLP
|
|
|
How Reg BI Changes the Fiduciary Landscape for the 401(k) Plan Sponsor
"On the face of it, the new Rule should allow clients to take a peek behind the curtain when selecting among various vendors.... The SEC cites four separate and unique 'obligations' broker-dealers must adhere to: [1] Disclosure Obligation; [2] Care Obligation; [3] Conflict-of-Interest Obligation; and, [4] Compliance Obligation. This reflects the ongoing evolution of regulation investment advice that brings the industry closer to a uniform fiduciary standard."
Fiduciary News
|
The Major Impact Made by 401(k) Plans
"77 percent of all US households surveyed indicated that they were confident that 401k and other employer-sponsored retirement plan accounts can help individuals meet their retirement goals. Confidence among households owning at least one DC account or [IRA] in fall 2018 was even higher, at 83 percent. Even among households not currently owning retirement plan accounts, 62 percent expressed confidence in these plans."
401(k) Specialist
|
The Problem with Bonds in a Retirement Portfolio
"One problem with relying on a bond portfolio in retirement is that the income can’t last forever. Retirees who have been out of the workforce for years or decades might very well need to dip into the bond principal to meet expenses, which means the bonds collectively provide less income. Over time, the compounding effects of this cycle may be severe. Long-lived retirees may wish they had chosen a different path."
The Wall Street Journal; subscription may be required
|
How Gen Z's Retirement Will Be Different
"[W]hen it comes to retirement, the Class of 2023 also stands to have a different perspective. For them: [1] There have always been 401(k)s. [2] There has always been a Roth option available to them ... [3] They've never had to sign up for their 401(k) plan ... [4] They may never have to make an investment choice in their 401(k) plan.... [5] They've always had fee information available to them about their 401(k). (It remains to be seen if they'll understand it any better than their parents.)"
American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries [ASPPA]
|
A Common Misunderstanding of the 'Student' 403(b) Exclusion Arises During Document Restatement Process
" 'Student' status means nothing in the 401(k) world, but it is one of the few classes of employees which can be excused by employers from the universal availability rule of 403(b) plans. Student employees do not have to be given the opportunity its to make elective deferrals into the 403(b) -- and given the often transient nature of student employment at colleges and university, this is a welcome exclusion."
Business of Benefits
|
ESOP Reverse Allocations
"Companies that face the challenge of making equity sharing and participation in their ESOP plan more meaningful to newer and younger employees may consider the option of a reverse allocation. This approach alters the ESOP ownership structure to provide a greater opportunity to newer employees."
Employee Benefits Law Group
|
[Opinion]
ERISA at 45: Bolstering Retirement Security for the Next 45 Years
"ERISA was enacted when the average worker's dream was spending their career with one company and retiring with a gold watch and a comfortable pension. Perhaps that is the best sign that a new system ... is needed to better reflect today's economy rather than updating a system which has long outlived its original goals."
Buck
|
|
Benefits in General
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans
|
One-Two Punch to Defuse Severance and Other Benefit Disputes
"[T]he 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ... shut the door on a former Shell executive who sought $1.5 million of severance based on his interpretation of the severance laws of his home country (India).... Shell succeeded mainly because its severance-related documents were straightforward and did not open the door for claims based on improper interpretations or miscalculations." [Bangaru v. Shell U.S. Hosting Company, No. 18-20808 (5th Cir. Sep. 4, 2019)
The Wagner Law Group
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Power of Attorney Rejected by IRS
We've had several clients receive rejection notices related to our Forms 2848 recently. All were related to DFVC filings. The notice stated the plan number was not included. However, the plan number was listed on the Form 2848 in the top right hand corner in the applicable box as well in the table on line 3. Has anyone else been receiving these? Are they being sent in error?
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Foreign-Owned Company Wants to Recognize Service with the Parent
Company A is based overseas, has wholly owned subsidiary in U.S. with a plan. Several employees from parent will be working for the U.S. company.[1] Are they required to recognize service with the parent company?[2] If yes, do we need to do an amendment? [3] Is the same controlled group testing done for foreign companies (in case this parent owns some or all of other companies not based in the U.S.)?
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|