COVID-19 Withdrawals: Why Plans Shouldn't Allow Them
"These CARES Act withdrawal provisions were enacted with good intentions. However, taking advantage of them will generally not be in most participants' best interest.... [1] Savings are likely permanently removed ... [2] The impact of withdrawals likely is devastating ... [3] Bankruptcy protections should be considered ... [4] Shares are likely to be sold at a loss ... [5] Enhanced unemployment compensation is available ... [6] This is a temporary situation ... [7] You can always change your mind."
Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants
|
Coronavirus Crisis Cuts Average 401(k) Balance as Pandemic Pummels Retirement Savings
"The average [401(k)] account balance dropped 19% in the first quarter to $91,400 -- down from a record $112,300 at the tail end of 2019. Separately, the average [IRA] balance dropped 14% to $98,900.... [T]he U.S. in March was only at the very beginning of the pandemic's economic crisis, and experts widely predict savings -- and retirement savings accounts -- will plunge as millions of Americans find themselves newly unemployed or subject to a pay cut and in need of financial resources."
U.S. News & World Report
|
|
|
Big Jump Expected in Pension Funding Obligations
"Funding obligations for U.S. corporate defined benefit plans are likely to increase by more than 98% in 2021 compared with 2020 ... The study said if the original version of the [CARES] Act introduced by the U.S. House of Representatives had been passed, the 703 companies would have saved more than $12 billion in 2021.... The version of the CARES Act signed by President Donald Trump on March 27 included only a contribution holiday for corporations, allowing them to defer their minimum required contributions for 2020 until next year."
Pensions & Investments
|
|
|
ERISA Settlements: The Non-Monetary Concessions Continue to Mount
"In recent months ERISA class action settlements were announced involving MIT and Duke University... [who] agreed to pay $18.1 million and $10.65 million, respectively, to settle those cases.... But that's just the tip of the iceberg. As with Johns Hopkins and others, MIT and Duke also agreed to 'substantial non-monetary terms,' which the parties claimed materially added to the total value of their settlements."
Thompson Hine, via Lexology; free registration required
|
Auto-Feature Implementation Continues to Rise as Plans Recognize the Advantages (PDF)
"Auto enrollment saw growth in adoption, to 69% in 2019, up from 60% in 2016.... 69% of plans offer auto escalation, up from 50% from our prior survey.... More than eight in ten plan sponsors have set a default deferral rate increase of 1%.... [P]eriodic sweeps are only used by about 20% of plan sponsors, indicating it is viewed as a tactical remedy rather than as a strategic tool."
Defined Contribution Institutional Investment Association [DCIIA]
|
|
|
|
Benefits in General
|
Sixth Circuit Offers Fresh Look at ERISA Exhaustion of Remedies Requirement
"A [recent] concurring opinion ... by U.S. Circuit Judge Amul Thapar of the Sixth Circuit raises provocative questions about the administrative exhaustion doctrine in ERISA cases and suggests that other aspects of ERISA litigation are also ripe for reexamination.... [N]either ERISA Section 503 ... [nor] any other statutory provision in ERISA mandates administrative exhaustion. Nonetheless such a requirement has been created and uniformly enforced by all federal courts." [Wallace v. Oakwood Healthcare, Inc., No. 18-2316 (6th Cir. Mar. 31, 2020)]
DeBofsky Sherman Casciari Reynolds P.C.
|
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans
|
A Potential Alternative to Repricing Underwater Stock Options?
"[E]arlier this month the SEC essentially gave fast-track approval of the New York Stock Exchange's request to provide temporary waivers of the shareholder approval requirements applicable to certain kinds of equity issuances under the NYSE's Listed Company Manual. Although focused on capital raising, this waiver could provide an alternative to option repricing for officers and directors at some companies."
Winston & Strawn LLP
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
► It's easy to sign up and participate in discussions! Post answers, ask questions, create custom feeds and views. Join your peers (and potential referral sources or customers)—there is no charge.
|
ADP Test Fails When Top Paid Group Election Is Skipped
"A plan passed ADP testing in the past because it used the 'Top Paid Group' election. The plan's new TPA omitted the 'Top Paid Group' election in the plan document starting in 2018 and elected to use prior testing year's results. Under EPCRS (Rev. Proc. 2019-19), Section 6.02, is it possible to change the method that was used to correct the testing for 2019?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Effect of Dual Eligibility on Testing Requirements?
"My client is setting up a safe harbor 401(k) plan with a SH matching contribution and wants to implement dual eligibility, that is, allow participants to defer immediately into the plan but require one year of service in order to receive the match? Is there any concern in having dual eligibility? How would you test these dual eligibility groups each year? What complications would you see in implementing a plan like this?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
Using the Form 5500 Special Extension Box?
"Are people using the special extension box now for this COVID 19 extension on a 6/30/19 plan year-end (for example)? And are you just typing in COVID-19 or Coronavirus or what? Have they told us what to write?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|