[Guidance Overview]
Proposed DOL Rule Limits Consideration of ESG Factors in Investment Decisions
"The proposed rule expressly clarifies that plan fiduciaries may never subordinate the interests of plan participants and beneficiaries in their retirement income to nonfinancial objectives.... In the rare circumstances where a plan fiduciary determines alternative investments to be economically indistinguishable, and one of the investments is selected based on nonfinancial or ESG factors, the proposed rule adds new language requiring fiduciaries to document why the investments were determined to be indistinguishable and why the selected investment was chosen."
Sidley Austin LLP
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Provides Guidance on 2020 Required Minimum Distribution Waivers and More
"[T]he plan sponsor can elect to apply the 'no new annuity starting date' rule so spousal consent should not apply ... The RMD amount is not an eligible rollover distribution for withholding purposes so mandatory 20% withholding does not apply.... The 2020 RMD waiver does not apply to defined benefit plans."
Groom Law Group
|
[Guidance Overview]
Puerto Rico Extends Due Date for Coronavirus-Related Distributions from Qualified Retirement Plans
"The Hacienda rules on CRDs remain exactly as described in Circular Letter of Internal Revenue No. 20-23, except for the following two items: [1] Going forward, applications for CRDs are not required to be notarized.... [2] [P]lan administrators, recordkeepers, and trustees now have until December 31, 2020, to complete CRDs to participants (i.e., not just receive the application, but send the payment, either by mail or electronically).... Hacienda did not extend the amendment adoption due date."
Ogletree Deakins
|
|
|
How Restaurant Menus Can Impact Retirement Savings Rates
"If you set the options at 8, 10, and 12 percent, there's a strong likelihood that a majority of people will enroll at 10 percent, choosing the middle option and avoiding the 'high priced' choice (i.e. 12 percent).... By choosing 10 percent, they are enrolling at a much higher percentage than the default and moving much closer (and faster) to the types of savings rate required for a successful retirement."
Greenspring Advisors
|
|
|
The Role of Affect and Social Norms in Preferences for Guaranteed Income Streams in Retirement
"Decumulation decisions require individuals to consider a range of issues ... An underexplored factor in these decisions is ... the emotional content of retirement messages and the emotions that consumers bring to the decisions. This paper describes a series of empirical analyses and experimental studies that explore the role of affect, as well as the use of social norms messaging, in encouraging interest in annuity uptake."
TIAA Institute
|
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Provides Additional Guidance on COVID-19 Cancellation of Compensation Deferral Elections
"[Notice 2020-50] clarifies that if a participant receives a distribution from an eligible retirement plan that constitutes 'a coronavirus-related distribution,' that distribution will be considered a hardship distribution pursuant to Section 409A.... Therefore, a participant who elects and receives a coronavirus-related distribution can cancel his or her a non-qualified plan deferral election at the same time."
Winston & Strawn LLP
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
► It's easy to sign up and participate in discussions! Post answers, ask questions, create custom feeds and views. Join your peers (and potential referral sources or customers)—there is no charge.
|
Ways to Digest DB/CB Plan Overfunding After NRA
"Husband and wife DB plan, both passed NRA of 62, are looking to terminate the plan, but plan asset value has exceeded 415 lump sum by $1 million. What are the ways to solve the overfunding issue so they can terminate the plan? One way an actuary suggested to me is having both participants start taking in-service distribution, which can be treated as eligible rollover distribution and rolled over to IRA without tax implications. But it seems to violate one of the exclusions of an eligible rollover distribution: 'a series of substantially equal periodic payments over a period specified in section 402(c)(4)(A)'. Is this really workable?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|