[Guidance Overview]
"Announcement 2020-17 ... postpones until January 15, 2021, the deadline for reporting and paying excises taxes related to unpaid minimum required contributions (MRCs) to single-employer defined benefit plans.... Under the CARES Act, the deadline for making MRCs, including quarterly contributions, for single-employer defined benefit plans during the 2020 calendar year is postponed to January 1, 2021 " 
Thomson Reuters Practical Law
|
[Guidance Overview]
"By gathering this information, the DOL and Treasury will be better prepared to oversee the PEP market and to provide regulatory agencies, prospective employer customers, and the public with relevant data about available PPPs. Each PPP will be responsible for its own registration and for any update or supplement to past filings." 
Ascensus
|
[Guidance Overview]
"Under the Proposed Rule, plan fiduciaries must research all material facts and analyze each proxy vote to determine if that vote would have an economic benefit to the plan ... [To] minimize the increased costs of such investigations and analysis, the fiduciary may choose to use a permitted policy outlined in the regulations ... [1] voting proxies with management, [2] voting only on certain types of corporate events (e.g., mergers and acquisitions), or [3] voting only if the corporate stock makes up a minimum threshold of the plan's investment holdings." 
Groom Law Group
|
[Guidance Overview]
"[T]he IRS will not deem a partial termination to have occurred if a plan sponsor is able to rehire terminated employees before the end of 2020.... [An] applicable period is not necessarily one plan year -- it can span across multiple plan years. The IRS Release does mention rehiring before the end of an 'applicable period' but in its example the IRS only refers to rehiring 'by the end of' 2020. There is uncertainty as to what happens if the rehiring takes place in 2021[.]" 
Boutwell Fay LLP
|
"[1] No established retirement plan committee.... [2] No investment policy statement.... [3] Definition of compensation issues.... [4] Lack of minutes from retirement plan oversight committee meetings.... [5] Lack of documentation of review of investment fees and other fees.... [6] Lack of documentation of annual review of service provider SOC-1 reports.... [7] Continued instances of late remittances of [employee elective] deferrals.... [8] Lack of cybersecurity controls and education to participants." 
Bradley Bartells, CPA, via LinkedIn
|
"[T]he deadline for cannabis companies with more than 100 employees is September 30, 2020.... For cannabis employers with more than 50 employees, the deadline is June 30, 2021; for cannabis employers with five or more employees, June 30, 2022.... While cannabis remains illegal under the federal law of the Controlled Substances Act, under ... the Internal Revenue [and ERISA], cannabis companies can sponsor and/or participate in 401(k) plans." 
CannaBizCentral
|
"[E]mployers in Illinois with at least 25 employees must comply with the Illinois' Secure Choice or offer employees an employer-sponsored retirement plan.... Enrollment for large employers with at least 500 employees was in December 2018; for employers with 100-499, July 2019; and for employers with 25-99, November 2019. In other words, if you have been operating for at least two years with 25 employees, ... [and] you haven't registered for Secure Choice and you haven't established a 401(k) plan, then you are exposed to a penalty of $250 per employee for the first year, and $500 per employee for each subsequent year." 
CannaBizCentral
|
34 pages. "Solutions can have more staying power and impact if they address underlying, structural fiscal issues and tackle imprudent approaches to allocate state and local government revenues, including pension contributions. This paper describes alternative approaches that public pension systems and their government relations teams should consider, understand, and bring up in discussions, debates, and negotiations." 
National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems [NCPERS]
|
"[If] you've built your portfolio up to a point that it meets your goals ... you don't need to keep gunning for additional returns. Instead, you can switch your focus to extracting your cash flows from a more conservatively positioned portfolio that provides you with peace of mind.... The key is that the portfolio spending rate must be low enough to make it work, and the portfolio should be positioned to support that spending as well as to accommodate inflation and short-term spending shocks." 
Morningstar
|
"A uniquely powerful Washington wonk. A hero of our retirement system. A pension rock star. One of the world's 30 top financial players. A legend. An inspiration. Mark Iwry has received plaudits like these from a variety of publications and people, along with awards for leadership, achievement, and innovation from organizations that typically don't agree on much: workers' rights groups, the payroll industry, the financial services industry, the IRS, the small business community, investment advisors, pension professionals, and others. To his acclamations, Harvard Kennedy School is adding its Alumni Public Service Award for Iwry's work to strengthen the economic security of working families." 
Harvard Kennedy School
|
|
Benefits in General
|
[Official Guidance]
"This annual notice provides the 2020-2021 special per diem rates for taxpayers to use in substantiating the amount of ordinary and necessary business expenses incurred while traveling away from home ... The special M&IE rates for taxpayers in the transportation industry are $66 for any locality of travel in the continental United States (CONUS) and $71 for any locality of travel outside the continental United States (OCONUS).... The rate for any CONUS or OCONUS locality of travel for the incidental expenses only deduction is $5 per day.... For purposes of the high-low substantiation method, the per diem rates ... are $292 for travel to any high-cost locality and $198 for travel to any other locality within CONUS." 
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
► It's easy to sign up and participate in discussions! Post answers, ask questions, create custom feeds and views. Join your peers (and potential referral sources or customers)—there is no charge.
|
"An employee of a 401(k) plan sponsor gets a W-2 and defers on those wages. He's also a partner in a partnership, which is a participating employer. He ends up with a large net loss for self-employment purposes. Do I need to net the two income sources, which would result in him having no 'compensation' for purposes of the plan?" 
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|