[Guidance Overview]
"Except for proposed rules regarding the registration requirement, the IRS and DOL have not provided guidance on the PEP and PPP rules.... The registration rules are quite extensive (79 pages) and would require significant disclosures by the PPP.... Although the IRS has not officially announced that pre-approved plans will be allowed to include PEP provisions, ASC expects this will be permitted ... Our understanding is that the IRS is working on this model plan language, but it has not provided an expected issuance date." 
ASC
|
[Guidance Overview]
"A plan administrator must determine whether it will maintain a continuously accessible website on which it will post the disclosures or whether it will provide the disclosures via email. There are similar, but slightly different requirements for each manner of compliance." 
Akerman
|
"The complaint suggests the plan's recordkeeping expenses demonstrate that defendants failed to engage in prudent monitoring and engage in prudent practices to keep those costs at competitive levels." [Johnson v. Duke Energy Corp., No. 20-528 (W.D.N.C. complaint filed Sep. 23, 2020)] 
PLANSPONSOR; free registration may be required
|
"[M]any of these lawsuits can be explained by the fact that the case law is maturing (providing a blue print for action) and that participants are more knowledgeable and attuned to fees ... [T]here are more tools and better data to reveal plan fees. But often, the reason for these lawsuits is simple neglect.... [A] few simple actions can improve fiduciary processes and reduce litigation risk[.]" 
NWPS
|
"Owning both a 401(k) plan and an individual retirement account (IRA) leads to larger balances, but missed opportunities to contribute and leakage reduce those balances." 
Employee Benefit Research Institute [EBRI]
|
"When you start saving $500 a month at age 22, you're contributing an extra $120,000 in principal compared with starting at age 42. But there's a huge difference between that extra $120,000 in contributions and the extra $1.86 million you end up with as a result of investing that principal for an extra 20 years and giving it an extra 20 years to compound." 
MassMutual
|
"Defined benefit plan sponsors that [1] currently [use] the standard (spot-rate) method to determine unfunded vested benefits (UVBs) for purposes of calculating [PBGC] variable-rate premiums, and who [2] have the ability to elect to switch to the alternative (24-month average) method, may have an opportunity to reduce (in some cases significantly) 2020 variable-rate premiums by doing so. This election generally must be made (for a calendar plan) by October 15, 2020. The decision with respect to this election is made particularly acute by the continuing decline in interest rates over the period 2019-2020." 
October Three Consulting
|
"Cannabis employers in the state of Oregon will be required to offer their employees a retirement savings program to save in, regardless of how many employees they have -- whether it be one or 100." 
FisherBroyles LLP, via Lexology; free registration required
|
[Opinion]
"The [DOL] has proposed two sets of amendments to the ERISA fiduciary regulations that would discourage plans from making ESG/sustainable investment decisions (including selecting, keeping, or exercising ownership rights). These changes would affect not only ERISA plans, but would appear to have similar effects on all trusteed tax-exempt savings and retirement plans, such as those maintained for state and local employees. If adopted these proposals would dramatically reverse long-standing policies without any convincing legal basis. Moreover, these proposals may also discourage ESG/sustainable investing by state and local savings and retirement plans." 
Law Offices of Albert Feuer, via SSRN
|
Benefits in General
|
"[T]he 202nd open meeting of the [ERISA Advisory Council] will be held via a teleconference on Thursday, October 22, and Friday, October 23, 2020 ... The purpose of the open meeting is for Advisory Council members to hear testimony from invited witnesses and to receive an update from [EBSA]. The Advisory Council will study the following topics: [1] Examining Top Hat Plan Participation and Reporting, and [2] Considerations for Recognizing and Addressing Participants with Diminished Capacity." 
Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]
|
"The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ... has held that a plaintiff properly pled her breach of fiduciary duty claim for equitable relief against an employer in connection with a third party administrator's clerical error in calculating life insurance benefits payable to her under the employer's ERISA welfare plan." [Sullivan-Mestecky v. Verizon Communications Inc., No. 18-1591 (2d Cir. Jun. 1, 2020)] 
The Wagner Law Group
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
► It's easy to sign up and participate in discussions! Post answers, ask questions, create custom feeds and views. Join your peers (and potential referral sources or customers)—there is no charge.
|
"With those recordkeepers and third-party administrators that offer a Section 3(16) service for the service provider to decide claims for a distribution, including a hardship distribution: [1] Does an employer/administrator want a power to override the service provider's decision? [2] Does a Section 3(16) service provider want the employer/administrator to have such a power (even if the employer/administrator doesn't want the power)? BenefitsLink mavens, what's your experience about what's happening?" 
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
"Doctors' group has one main 401(k) plan for staff and each doctor has separate plan (due to historically having separate plans even though plan provisions and investment opportunities presently mimic the main plan). Eligibility requires 1 year of service. Can a doctor start their own plan in the year of hire and make contributions to that plan even though they would not have been eligible to make contributions in the main plan?" 
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
"I am curious to hear the group's thoughts on what to do about UBIT shares (that is, shares in an S-corp that were long ago transferred from an ESOP to a non-ESOP portion of the plan in order to avoid a failing 409(p))." 
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|