|
|
[Guidance Overview]
"For most employers the most significant change in the 2020 draft instructions compared to previous iteration is the plan start month box is now required.... Employers who decided to sponsor an ICHRA have a whole new set of rules to assist them in completing the Form 1095-C. Fortunately, most employers will not even need to concern themselves with all of the new ICHRA rules and reporting should be very similar to previous years." 
Accord
|
"Early in the pandemic, the IRS and DOL issued a temporary rule (published May 4, 2020) extending certain deadlines applicable to retirement plans and health and welfare plans.... The examples in the temporary rule assumed an end date of April 30, 2020 for the National Emergency, which would have extended the Outbreak Period through June 29, 2020. As we all now know, this National Emergency did not end on April 30, and in fact it is still in place.... As the crisis has extended, the impact of the 'temporary rule' is becoming more of an issue." 
Holland & Hart LLP
|
"Novel specialty medications hit the market. Costly prescribing trends emerge. New patterns of fraud, waste and abuse are hatched. A pharmacy benefit manager's (PBM) ability to detect such opportunities, then quickly act on them, can impact millions of dollars in pharmacy spend every year. Yet, one PBM might take days or weeks to act on an opportunity that another PBM takes months to identify, let alone respond to.... So how can you tell which PBMs are nimble and which are slower to move?" 
Evolent Health
|
|
Benefits in General
|
35 pages. "When a participant presents a prima facie case for coverage and the plan seeks to limit her benefits based on plan language, the plan should bear the burden of proving the limitation.... The district court erred by rejecting burden shifting, holding instead that an ERISA plan participant has the burden to prove how a limitation does not bar her from eligibility for benefits. If necessary to reach this burden question, this Court should correct the lower court's error by requiring the plan to prove benefit limitations, which more appropriately aligns with the common law for insurance and conforms with general principles governing the allocation of burdens." [Ovist v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of N. Amer.,
No. 17-40113 (D. Mass Mar. 27, 2020; on appeal to 6th Cir. No. 20-1464)] 
U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]
|
"[E]nterprise-wide risk analyses should account not only for PHI, but also for other personally identifiable information (PII). Nearly every organization will possess PII, ... with each bearing privacy and security obligations under a variety of federal laws and regulations specifically addressing cybersecurity practices. Organizations must also be mindful of state and local requirements concerning cybersecurity[.]" 
Health Law Advisor, Epstein Becker Green
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
Article submission: Online form
BenefitsLink Health & Welfare Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9595. Copyright 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
Privacy Policy
|