|
[Guidance Overview]
"Although the term 'participant election' is used in the regulatory guidance and the Notices, the physical presence requirement -- and the relief -- applies for any consent, election, request, agreement or similar communication from a participant, beneficiary, alternate payee, or an individual entitled to benefits under a retirement plan, employee benefit arrangement, or individual retirement plans where a physical presence is required. For example, the election to waive a qualified joint and survivor annuity benefit from a retirement plan."
Faegre Drinker
|
[Guidance Overview]
"Plan sponsors, and their recordkeepers, should review their plan procedures to see if the escheatment process is used. And, only if it is, then they should update their escheatment process as necessary to reflect the standard Form 1099-R reporting and withholding rules by no later than for payments made after 2021. This has been particularly difficult for processes that escheat in-kind, as that makes it difficult to obtain the necessary withholding."
Groom Law Group
|
"[H]aving a properly written, well-understood, cyber insurance policy can be the difference between making it through an incident relatively unscathed or emerging at the end, significantly battered and bruised (or, frankly, perhaps not emerging at all).... This rapid evolution in coverage prompts a few questions: Is any of this covered by my current insurance? What does cyber insurance actually do for me? How do I know if my broker knows my cyber risk?"
Ferenczy Benefits Law Center
|
"A compliance calendar keeps track of your company's required filings, their due dates and related details so you can avoid incurring any fines or other penalties for late filings or missing information. [This chart] is intended to alert ... readers to some of the significant regulatory dates for 2021[.]"
PLANSPONSOR; free registration may be required
|
"Recordkeepers in DC pension plans are often paid indirectly in the form of revenue sharing from third-party funds on the menu. [The authors] show that these arrangements affect the investment menu of 401(k) plans. Revenue-sharing funds are more likely to be added to the menu and are less likely to be deleted. Overall, revenue-sharing plans are more expensive as higher expense ratios are not offset by lower direct fees or by superior performance. Rebates increase with the market power of the recordkeeper suggesting that third-party funds may revenue share to gain access to retirement assets."
Veronika Krepely Pool, Clemens Sialm, Irina Stefanescu, via SSRN
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
► It's easy to sign up and participate in discussions! Post answers, ask questions, create custom feeds and views. Join your peers (and potential referral sources or customers)—there is no charge.
|
"An Association MEP exists of businesses that operate stores of a certain retailer. These stores sell products. One of its participating employers is in a controlled group with a business that cleans pools as a service but is not a member of the retail association that sponsors the MEP and couldn't be a member based on the association bylaws. Would the fact that a controlled group exists and the plan document automatically pulls in related group members allow this pool cleaning business to participate in the MEP that it otherwise wouldn't be eligible to participate in? Is anything violated by allowing this?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
"Individual A is a minority shareholder -- owns 1% of Company B. Individual A runs a TPA/service provider and wants to provide services to Company B's retirement plan. Does this fall under the standard service provider exception?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
"Does Internal Revenue Code section 4980(d)(2)(C)(iv) ('Unallocated amounts at termination' of a replacement plan into which assets have been transferred) imply that if the amount of the transfer is not allocated by the end of the 7-year period referred to in 4980(d)(2)(C)(i) that it can continue to be allocated, until the termination of the replacement plan? For example, in an owner-and-spouse-only scenario, if you need more than 7 years to allocate due to the 415(c) limitations, you could continue this for additional years as necessary as long as the plan is open and there is participant compensation to allocate it against?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
Article submission: Online form
BenefitsLink Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587. Copyright 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
Privacy Policy
|