Featured Jobs
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Southern Pension Services
|
|
BPAS
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Pentegra
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
3 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
National Bureau of Economic Research [NBER]; purchase required for full paper
Sept. 15, 2025
"[J]ob satisfaction is higher for employees in ESOPs than for observationally similar workers in non-ESOP firms and for [work from home (WFH)] workers than for their non-WFH peers.... ESOPs raise satisfaction by increasing worker participation on collective workplace or firm decisions while WFH raise satisfaction by increasing worker flexibility in their individual work activity.... ESOPs had more extensive WFH than non-ESOP firms during the COVID-19 pandemic."
|
| 2. |
National Bureau of Economic Research [NBER], purchase required
Oct. 4, 2010
Excerpt: A common argument for full funding is that pensions are a form of deferred compensation that does not justify a debt. The paper examines public finance, political economy, and financial market issues that bear on optimal funding, broadly and in a series of models.
|
| 3. |
National Bureau of Economic Research [NBER], purchase required
Oct. 29, 2012
"This paper calculates the effect that introducing risk-sharing during either retirement or the working life would have on public sector pension liabilities. [The first model considers] the introduction of a variable annuity for the retirement phase, modeled on the Wisconsin Retirement System, in which positive benefit adjustments are granted only if asset returns surpass 5% but benefits cannot fall below their initial levels. This change would reduce unfunded accrued liabilities by around 25%, and would lower the annual contribution increases required to target full funding in 30 years by 11%. If there is no minimum benefit guarantee, the impact of introducing variable annuities is substantially larger: the unfunded liability would fall by over half and required annual contribution increases would fall by 44%."
|
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|